DisplayPort is an interface that is primarily used to connect a source of video and display it on a device like a monitor and a projector. It also carries audio, USB, and other data forms.
Mini DisplayPort is a version of the DisplayPort interface that uses a small plug and a socket compared to the original DisplayPort.
There are some basic differences starting from its size to its compatibility level.
This article brings you some important facts to distinguish between DisplayPort and Mini DisplayPort.
In general, many of us are not aware of which of the products is more convenient, and thus the following differences will make you clear about both the products and which one to choose.
If we compare the resolution display, the older versions of Mini DisplayPort display a similar quality of resolution to the DisplayPort of the original size.
The 1.1a version of DisplayPort offers a resolution of up to 2560 x 1600, the 1.2 version of Displayport sets up to 4096 x 2160 resolution display.
On the other hand, the Mini DisplayPort cable does not support the versions like 1.3, 1.4, 1.4a, or 2.0. Customers can get a limited amount of bandwidth when it comes to the Mini DisplayPort.
DisplayPort vs Mini DisplayPort in respect of monitor setup
Single Monitor Setup
Both the ports are dependent upon the monitor one is using, the kind of setup is according to one’s choice. If you have a solo monitor, and if it consists of a Mini DisplayPort, then you can easily go for Mini DP cables.
But if the monitor contains a regular-sized DisplayPort, then you must go for the original DP cables. In case you are having both the ports available on your monitor, then you will get the latest updated versions with higher resolution display features.
If you want to get the latest features, you must always go for the larger and newer versions of DisplayPort. The price is pretty much the same for all the versions of DisplayPort.
The compatibility of all the versions is good and one can buy this product without any worries.
The bandwidth and resolution offered by DisplayPort are very good if you are using a single monitor setup.
When it comes to a multi-monitor setup, the level of bandwidth lacks if you are not careful with how many monitors you are using and their resolution display.
If you are using multiple monitors, you will be getting some options like:
- If the graphics card you are using has more than one Displayport output, you can easily connect separate cables for each monitor and have the same display.
- The high-performance gaming graphics card will mostly have two DisplayPort outputs. Sometimes the graphics cards are built specifically for multiple monitor setups and are used in high platform businesses where there are up to four DisplayPort outputs.
If you have one output on the graphics card you are using, and only one DisplayPort input on each of your monitors, then a DisplayPort hub and split the signal so that the signal is sent to more than one monitor.
Hubs are easily available in the market and can support more than one monitor.
Reason for the gradual decrease in the level of demand for Mini DisplayPort:
The Mini DisplayPort, developed by Apple in 2008, is eventually being replaced by DVI ports.
Earlier the mini DP was used for all Apple products starting from the MacBook to Mac Pro and all others. Thus the level of sales decreased after the replacement by Apple.
Later, the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) reached an agreement with Apple, i.e., to license the latest tech into DisplayPort standards.
This resulted in a huge impact on the technical market and companies like Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Asus started using similar input for their devices. Previously, DisplayPort was limited to laptops and rare tablets.
After 8 long years, Apple started replacing the mini DisplayPort with USB-C. Hence the replacement port was used by the company for its devices including the desktops which resulted in the replacement.
The Mini DisplayPort is usually used in mobile electronics but the DisplayPort 1.2 offers higher bandwidth used for monitors, televisions, and projectors.
The company further did not invest any resources in the mini DisplayPort as customer demand is low for higher versions that have more bandwidth.